Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyclad Records
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. No assertion of notability (WP:A7). The speedy tag got removed at some point and was never readded. Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Skyclad Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article does not assert nor pass notability Canis Lupus 13:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7, so nominated ukexpat (talk) 15:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There are several references to the company at this Google News archive search in the context of articles about bands on the label, including some about the difficulties for bands caused by the company's collapse. There are no articles there primarily about the company, though. --Eastmain (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN, RS. We66er (talk) 01:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.